Showing posts with label ttl. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ttl. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

Strobist Sunday at Santa Monica with the Stylus 1



Last Sunday, we went to Santa Monica's Pacific Park, a small amusement park at the famous Santa Monica pier.  I took some shots Strobist-style (i.e. with off-camera flash).  In this post, I would like to share some samples comparing on-camera flash, off-camera flash, and no flash.


Friday, August 21, 2015

Nissin Air Di700a (radio wireless TTL) now available for Sony

,


The Nissin Air Di700a, a radio-based wireless TTL system which I wrote about here, is apparently now available for Sony cameras. According to another ebay listing, it uses the new Multi-Interface Shoe.(used in the a6000, a7 series, etc.), not the Minolta hotshoe.

The seller describes it as a "pre-sale" (pre-order) although the seller's specified release date has already passed, so it appears to be readily available.  You should probably contact the seller to confirm.  Also please note the price of this combination is significantly higher than the price of a similar kit for Nikon or Canon, which is around $300.  Hopefully, it becomes available at a lower price for Sony as well.

Tuesday, August 11, 2015

True or False? "Aperture Controls Flash, Shutter Speed Controls Ambient"

One of the often-repeated rules of thumb for flash is that "aperture controls flash, while shutter speed controls ambient."  In this post, we'll see why this adage can be misleading.

Wednesday, March 4, 2015

Radio-based wireless TTL for Sony, Nikon and Canon

image by Nissin Group
 
Nissin is producing an affordable radio-based wireless TTL flash and trigger for Canon, Nikon and, starting this summer, for Sony as well.  There are already several radio-based TTL systems for Canon and Nikon.  However, for Sony, this is a welcome addition because the only such system available thus far is the Phottix Odin, and Nissin's system appears to have a lower total cost.

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Flash Series - Part 4: Triggering Your Hotshoe Flashes + eBay RF Trigger

Welcome to the fourth part of the flash series, we've already discussed some of the Canon flashes, home made flash gels and reviewed the Rogue grid. Today I am going to talk about how I trigger my flashes, and my experience with non-branded cheap triggers. Click on to read more.

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Pumpkin Patch Day (Basic)


Sit with me, dad!
Originally uploaded by mic_ty
Our toddler had a pumpkin patch day at school. We had less than a minute to take a photo of him as kids took turns on this set.

The ambient light was not bad - it was open shade. I considered taking the photo with just ambient light but opted to use the 25" Creative Light shoot-through umbrella that I brought with me. I used an SB-800 on wireless TTL mode and covered the popup commander flash with an SG-3IR panel to avoid any harsh shadows from the popup flash.  I underexposed the ambient by a stop, and allowed TTL to expose normally.

As for the lens choice, I wanted to use the Sigma 50-150 but there wasn't much space in the small area for this shot, so I used the Tamron 17-50 VC.

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Balancing Flash and Ambient: Does TTL take ambient exposure into account? (Basic)

All other factors being equal, does TTL ignore the ambient exposure and add a fixed amount of light, or does TTL take the ambient exposure into account so that the total exposure is the constant?  This question is relevant when thinking about balancing ambient and flash when they overlap.  I took some test shots and found that for my equipment combination the answer appears to be somewhere in between, though closer to the latter (i.e. constant overall exposure).  YMMV.

Test protocol: the test target was a plain white cardboard. I took control shots using ambient only light (which was from yellowish fluorescent light) in manual exposure (in matrix metering), with the light meter at 0, -1, -2, -3, plus one shot at sync speed with practically zero ambient.  I took similar shots with TTL flash and TTL-BL flash.  Equipment used: D300 and SB-800.


Results:

First column: ambient-only
Second column: ambient + TTL flash (0 FEC)
Third column: ambient + TTL-BL flash (0 FEC)
The top row is with the light meter at 0, and the next rows are with the light meter at -1, -2, -3 respectively.  The bottom row is with ambient "deleted."

For the ambient-only column, the changes in exposure are what I expected. The second (TTL) and third column (TTL-BL) seem to show a more-or-less constant exposure.  If the amount of flash that is added to the image is constant, I would have expected the exposure to vary about as much as the ambient-only exposure.  The fact that there is seemingly no variation implies that TTL does take ambient exposure into account to keep the final overall exposure (the sum of the ambient exposure and flash exposure) close to constant.  (Note: in the actual shots, the histograms were a bit different, and crept upwards with increasing ambient light.)

In the top and second rows, the colors are a bit different because a greater percentage of the overall exposure comes from the ambient exposure (which is yellowish in color).  I tried using a simple black and white conversion in Corel PSP X3 to see how close the luminance values are, and here's what I got:

The numbers in the boxes represent the 8-bit RGB value in the middle of the box (I don't know how to display the luminance value on a pixel level but I take it that the value shown here is a decent proxy for luminance). Note the noticeably higher value in the top row for the second and third columns.  This reinforces the concept that the ambient must be at least slightly underexposed relative to our desired exposure (the flash can't take away light after all - it can only add light).

Application: if indeed TTL makes overall ambient exposure constant, then balancing flash and ambient when they overlap becomes much easier than otherwise, because we would be free to adjust the ambient to the desired exposure, leaving TTL to do the heavy lifting (in calculation terms) to reach a 'correct' overall (ambient + flash) exposure.  The only limit appears to be that the ambient must be at least slightly underexposed if we don't want to overexpose it when we add flash.  My results are limited however to my equipment.  You can test if your equipment combination also behaves similarly by taking test shots with the protocol above.

Friday, October 1, 2010

Super Manual Flash

David Hobby (Strobist.com) recently posted an interesting tip for manual flash users that will allow the camera to track the ambient exposure automatically, even with variable ambient light conditions: http://strobist.blogspot.com/2010/10/how-to-track-ambient-automatically.html . Clearly, there's some benefit from not having to keep adjusting flash or ambient exposure as conditions change. Taking that a step further, wouldn't it be cool if you've setup the shot and have nailed the flash and ambient exposure, and the flash was smart enough to adjust power automatically to maintain that flash exposure even if you reposition your lights or adjust your exposure? OK you saw this coming... I'm talking of course about TTL flash.

If you're a manual-only flash user, and you do any photography other than setup shots, I really would strongly recommend adding TTL flash to your repertoire. The great thing is, if you already know manual flash, you already have a leg up.

BUT TTL IS SO UNPREDICTABLE AND INCONSISTENT
Common criticisms by manual flash users about TTL flash include unpredictability and variability:
- Unpredictable in that "you never know what you're gonna get".
- Variable in that TTL uses the reflection from preflashes to guess the correct flash exposure and is thus subject to reflection-based metering weaknesses. For example, even though aperture, ISO, flash-to-subject distance, and the flash's guide number are held constant, flash exposure can vary depending on the reflectance of the image in the frame (which in turn can vary based on the reflectance of the subject or other elements).

OK, guilty as charged on both counts. In theory, you never know with 100% certainty what flash exposure you're going to get with TTL until you take at least that first test shot. In reality though, TTL gets reasonably close to an ok flash exposure. This is not that much different from using manual flash without a flashmeter or calculator (for GN calculations). The difference is that instead of you guessing the amount of power you need, the camera and flash offer a ballpark estimate. If you don't like the flash exposure you get, you simply adjust with flash exposure compensation - the same way you would adjust your power upward or downward if you didn't like the flash exposure you got with your test shot on manual flash mode.

It's also true that TTL can be variable even under conditions when flash exposure should be constant. Fortunately, if this theoretical variability is truly a dealbreaker for you, there are a few answers for that.

1. For Canon, Nikon and Olympus:
Spot meter a gray card when you take the shot. TTL will set flash exposure to render that gray card as middle gray (within the flash's power limits). This will work even in conditions that would normally fool TTL such as including a highly reflective object in the shot. Adjust flash exposure upward or downward if you wish using flash exposure compensation. Then use FV lock (aka FEL or FV Flash Lock) to lock the desired flash exposure. You will get the same flash exposure consistency that you will get from manual.

2. For Sony, Pentax, and other cameras that don't have FV Lock:
Include a gray card in your test shot, and adjust TTL flash exposure (with flash exposure compensation) to render the gray card as gray. When you do this, don't spot meter from the gray card because if you remove the gray card then the flash exposure will change. Just use the gray card in the frame as a guide for an "accurate" flash exposure.

In real life, TTL shooters don't use a gray card because we just use FEC to adjust whenever we don't like the flash exposure. Plus, most of the time (at least for me), the flash exposure doesn't really vary all that much anyway (except in unusual cases).

Ready to give TTL a try? Don't worry - it doesn't bite. :)

HOW TO USE TTL FLASH:
1. Set the ambient exposure as you would with manual flash.
2. Take a test shot with TTL flash.
3. Estimate the flash over- or underexposure and adjust the TTL flash accordingly, using flash exposure compensation.
4. Feel free to change shutter OR aperture OR ISO OR subject-to-flash distance OR any combination of the above. You can even change modifiers or filters or gels. TTL will keep the flash exposure the same!
It may help to think of TTL flash as a smart manual flash that can give you a reasonable guess of the right amount of power automatically upfront (which you can adjust), and also adjusts power automatically to keep your flash exposure the same from shot-to-shot, except that it isn't perfect so it needs tweaking upward or downward.

And if you're a TTL-only user reading this, check out these related posts:
TTL vs. Manual: a False Dilemma http://betterfamilyphotos.blogspot.com/2010/09/ttl-vs-manual-flash-false-dilemma.html
Therapy for TTL Addiction http://betterfamilyphotos.blogspot.com/2010/09/therapy-for-ttl-addiction-how-to-use.html

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Therapy for TTL Addiction: How to Use Manual Flash

Sure, you're a TTL expert but are you dependent on TTL? If your trusty SB-800 or 580EXII or whatever suddenly failed and all you had was a manual flash, would you be comfortable using it? I was a TTL addict but as I did more setup shots, I "saw the light" and became an advocate of learning both TTL and manual flash. See related post: http://betterfamilyphotos.blogspot.com/2010/09/ttl-vs-manual-flash-false-dilemma.html . This is a follow-up post for TTL-only users on how to learn and use manual flash. Don't worry, it's not as hard as it looks.



QUICK REVIEW OF MANUAL VS. TTL FLASH
With TTL, the camera guesses the flash exposure, then controls the flash output automatically to match that flash exposure. With manual, you control the amount of flash output to get the flash exposure you want.

BENEFITS OF LEARNING MANUAL FLASH
1. For setup shots, manual flash GUARANTEES predictability and repeatability. If the flash to subject distance doesn't change from shot-to-shot, and the aperture and ISO don't change, then the 'correct' flash exposure shouldn't change either, right? With TTL, the flash exposure may change if you change your composition and sometimes your colors (by zooming in, changing the subject's clothing, adding or changing the subject etc. etc.) even though the correct flash exposure shouldn't have changed. With manual flash, that variability is never going to be an issue. You always know what you're going to get.
2. With manual flash, I'm forced to pre-visualize the correct flash exposure. With TTL flash, there's always the temptation to accept the camera's guess of flash exposure because the truth is, with TTL, the flash exposure looks ok (from at least some point of view) most of the time. It's convenient but also easy to be lazy, instead of actively thinking about tone placement and the "look" that we want.
3. Awareness. If you only use TTL flash, you never know how much power the flash is using. Knowing the amount of power is useful to know how much more light is available if you want to use a smaller aperture or lower ISO. It's also useful for getting an idea of how much battery life you're using up (for some reason the SB800 and SB900 don't have battery life indicators).
4. Manual flash offers more bang for the buck. Manual flash is much cheaper than TTL in terms of the flashes themselves and the triggering options. Example of a wireless setup:
SB600 = $220. (If you don't have a commander-capable popup flash, add SU-800 commander $255.)
vs.
YN560 ($85) + RF-602 radio trigger transmitter and receiver ($30 on ebay) = $115. The incremental cost of adding additional flashes and receivers will be less (you only need one transmitter).
This is why I got a manual flash for my second flash (although I would have gotten an SB600 if I had extra money).
5. Sole control. With manual flash, you take out the camera's algorithms out of the equation. If the flash exposure sucks - it's your fault. If the flash exposure rocks - you da man.
6. Manual flash is usable with cameras that don't have hotshoes. Just get a manual flash with a built-in digital slave and you're good to go.

HOW TO USE MANUAL FLASH
The textbook way to use manual flash is to use a flashmeter. Another way is to estimate the distance from subject-to-flash and use the guide number equation. In reality, a number of manual flash users do without a flashmeter or calculator, and use trial-and-error intelligently.

Here's how I use manual flash:
1. I visualize the flash exposure.
2. I set the ISO, aperture and shutter speed for the conditions (underexposing if necessary). I may take a test shot (without flash) to confirm.
3. I set my best guess of manual flash power based on the ISO, aperture, and how I'm using the flash. If I'm using bare flash directly, then I will likely pick a low power like 1/64 or 1/32. If I'm using bounce flash, I will likely pick high power like full power or 1/2.
4. I take a test shot and check the result on the LCD and the histogram. (Note: the vertical lines on the histogram aren't totally random. They're about 1 stop apart.)
5. Based on the results, I estimate the amount of flash over- or underexposure in stops and adjust the manual flash power accordingly. If I want partial stops, I move the flash closer or further, and/or adjust aperture or ISO.
With this procedure, I usually get the flash exposure I want within 2 or 3 test shots. Here's a tip on how to get better at estimating flash over- or underexposure: use raw and learn postprocessing. When you postprocess as part of your regular workflow, you adjust exposure so often that you become better at estimating over- and underexposure. :) Oh, btw, plug in the exposure adjustment instead of using the slider.

This procedure is not as tedious as it may sound. Just think of it as really crummy TTL :)). With TTL we adjust the default flash exposure (0 FEC) based on the result we want. This is kind of like that, except that the default flash exposure may be way off.

Samples:
I used the above procedure for the shot at the top. A couple more sample shots using the same procedure:

Blogged here: http://betterfamilyphotos.blogspot.com/2010/08/real-estate-photos-part-1-strobist.html




Blogged here: http://betterfamilyphotos.blogspot.com/2010/07/selling-stuff-sexily-strobist-style.html

If you're a manual-only flash user, check out this related post: Super Manual Flash

Sunday, September 26, 2010

Preview of Yongnuo's radio commander and speedlight: YN460-TX and YN460-RX

LightingRumours.com posted Yongnuo's official announcement of its radio commander and speedlight, the YN460-TX and YN460-RX.  I downloaded the demo videos from Yongnuo's website, which weren't exactly crystal clear, and tried to figure out how the commander and flash work.

First of all, the system seems independent from the camera's wireless flash system (such as Nikon's Advanced Wireless Lighting).  Briefly, the system appears to allow radio TTL and manual capability with remote adjustment.

COMPONENTS:

There is a commander unit called the YN460-TX (which looks like the Nikon SU-800).  The TX commander is designed to be attached to the camera hotshoe and apparently can emit an AF assist light.  However, it also appears that the TX can be used off-camera (query whether the TTL capabilities would remain). According to Yongnuo, the TX commander can control up to 16 dedicated speedlights (YN460-RX), each of which has built-in radio capability. 

HOW IT'S USED:

The TX commander controls 3 groups simultaneously: a TTL group (TTL), Manual group 1 (M1), and Manual group 2 (M2).  To assign an RX flash to a group, you press the RX flash's mode button until the RX selects WT (for the TTL group), M1, or M2.  In addition to the WT, M1, and M2 mode, the RX unit has another wireless mode, WX which allows it to function either on manual or TTL, as explained below.

Wireless Manual:
Group M1: once an RX flash is assigned to M1, its power level can be selected by choosing the M1 group on the TX unit then adjusting the power level.  There are 7 power levels, in full stops from full power to 1/64 power.  There are no power indicators per se -- you have to count the number of LEDs lit.  1 LED = 1/64, 2 LEDs = 1/32 etc. 

Group M2 functions similarly. Its power is selected by choosing the M2 group on the TX and adjusting the power level.

Wireless TTL:  This was not clearly demonstrated in the videos.  It appears that TTL flash exposure can be adjusted from -3 to +3 FEC.  The video demo'd adjustment of FEC directly on the RX flash.  The videos did not demo wireless adjustment of FEC with the TX commander, though it seems the TX commander should have this capability because its LEDs are labeled -3 to +3, which wouldn't make sense except for TTL.


WX mode of the RX flash:  In WX mode, the RX flash will match the CURRENTLY SELECTED mode of the TX commander.  By contrast, if the RX is in WT mode, it will stay assigned to the TTL group, and if it is in M1 or M2 mode, it will stay in M1 group or M2 group respectively.  On the other hand, by using the RX flash in WX mode, it can join group WT, M1 or M2 as needed.  If the user wants the RX (on WX mode) to join the TTL group, then the user simply has to remember to switch the TX to TTL mode when he is ready to shoot.  If the user wants the RX on WX mode to join the M1 or M2 group, the user simply switches the TX to M1 or M2 respectively immediately before shooting.

The WX mode is useful when you only have one RX flash, allowing you to switch from TTL to manual anytime.  It is useful also if you want one of your RX flashes to be flexible and join any of the other groups as needed.

OTHER NOTES:
  • Uses 2.4ghz frequency.  Up to 200m range claimed.
  • 7 available channels.  (By contrast, Nikon's Advanced Wireless Lighting has only 4 channels.)
  • Supports rear curtain sync, flash exposure compensation (FEC) and "FEB" (flash exposure bracketing??)
  • There is a blue LED light to show that a link between the TX and RX has been established.
  • The TX appears to have 2 ports, one of which appears to be a PC sync.
  • The RX flash can also function on non-wireless manual mode.  It is not clear whether it can function as a non-wireless TTL flash.
  • LightingRumours.com, citing De.Rec.Fotografie, states that cost will be 200 euro for a TX and RX kit.  Availability is estimated to be within the next 2 months, direct from Yongnuo's ebay site with a 12-month warranty: http://stores.ebay.com/hkyongnuophotoequipment .

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

TTL vs. Manual Flash: A False Dilemma



Among flash users, there has been a rift between manual flash proponents and TTL flash advocates, with some proponents of one declaring their method superior to the other.

MANUAL VS. TTL: WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE

Manual flash means the user sets the power output himself in order to get the desired amount of flash recorded in the picture (i.e., flash exposure). The flash exposure is affected by the available power of the flash (its guide number), the aperture, the ISO, and the distance of the flash to the subject.

With TTL flash, the camera and flash set the output automatically in order to achieve a more or less _constant_ flash exposure (with almost any combination of guide number, aperture, ISO, or flash-to-subject distance), analogous to your P, A, or S modes trying to achieve a middle grey, which the user then adjusts to his or her liking using exposure compensation. With flash, the equivalent control is flash exposure compensation (FEC).

THE CONTROVERSY AND THE MYTH

Some manual flash users scoff at TTL. One of the nicknames for TTL in manual flash circles is "idiot mode." I think that reputation among some manual flash users is ironically based on ignorance about how TTL is controlled. It is true that TTL may be left to operate automatically, and no doubt the majority of TTL users do exactly that (assuming we include point-and-shoot cameras). Perhaps it is from that phenomenon that TTL gained a reputation for being completely automatic like the green mode on some cameras. However, I would wager that any person that calls TTL "idiot mode" does not really know how to control TTL. (Specifically, I doubt any such person would pass Lesson 11 of the TTL Flash Tutorial.)

Serious TTL users advocate adjusting TTL through flash exposure compensation, in addition to minding other lighting fundamentals such as balancing flash and ambient.

TTL CONTROL

A myth about TTL is that it doesn't offer as much "control" as manual flash. With respect to range there is an element of truth to that. With a good manual flash, you can choose any setting from full power to 1/128 power, a range of 7 stops (though some units have a range less than that). Pretty amazing control huh?

Well here's the thing: on my TTL flash, I can go anywhere from -3 FEC to +3 FEC, in 1/3 stop increments. A range of 6 stops. Not bad for an idiot mode. If I use cumulative FEC adjustments (meaning I make an adjustment on the camera's FEC button and the flash's FEC button), the range expands to -6 FEC to +4 FEC. A range of 10 stops. Moreover, a flash on TTL can go below 1/128 power, without any neutral density gels or workarounds.

The partial-stop increments are not to be ignored. Some flash units with manual flash can be adjusted in 1/3 stop increments, such as the SB-800 (indeed, the manual YN-560 flash can be adjusted in 1/8 stop increments). However, not all manual flash are capable of partial-stop increments between full power and minimum power. For those manual flash units, users adjust the distance between the flash and subject, alter the aperture or ISO, or use a neutral density gel to adjust the flash output in smaller increments.

THE CATCH

The catch with TTL is that the 0 FEC point is determined by the camera and flash, and as TTL becomes more advanced, the way that flash exposure determined becomes more complicated to understand. On the other hand, it's very unlikely that the camera and flash can be 6 stops away from the 'right'amount of flash.

The other complaint against TTL is consistency. With TTL, it is theoretically possible for the flash exposure to vary from shot to shot when the composition or zoom varies. If the ambient light, aperture, ISO, subject-to-flash distance, and the guide number of the flash do not change, then manual flash users point out that the flash exposure should also be consistent. In practice though, I haven't seen a huge variation shot-to-shot under conditions when flash exposure is supposed to be constant. In addition, in some cameras, there are tools such as FV lock (flash value lock -- analogous to auto exposure lock) that can lock the flash exposure for consistency.



IS TTL FLASH SUPERIOR TO MANUAL FLASH?

Short answer: in my opinion, no. Just as no single exposure mode (P, A, S, M) is superior in every situation, neither do I believe that TTL or manual will be superior to the other in all circumstances.

TTL is quicker in fast-changing shooting conditions (e.g. weddings) when ambient light varies constantly and subject to flash distance can vary greatly (especially if bouncing the flash). In such conditions, it is difficult to get the keep adjusting flash output with manual flash with each small change to maintain the result we want.

On the other hand, in setup shots where the flash is on a stand and won't be moving, and the subject will stay in the same place for the shots, using manual would guarantee control and consistency from shot to shot. There are also situations where we are pushing the flash to the limits of its power and we know in advance that we want to use full power -- it would make sense to switch to manual flash. Finally, there are rare occasions when TTL will simply fail for reasons that are not immediately apparent. In such cases, it would be great to know that you can always switch to manual.

Unless you take only one type of photo, I believe it makes sense to learn and be comfortable with both TTL and manual flash. I must confess I often use TTL (because most of my shots are candid) but I can switch to manual when needed. The shot at the beginning of this article was taken on an occasion when I was switching from one to the other, and sometimes combining both. Link to album.  I doubt that you can tell which shot was shot with which method. :)

WHICH TO LEARN FIRST

You can learn either one first, but I believe you can get more-or-less ok results faster with TTL flash. I analogize again to the P, A, and S modes. Many beginners, instead of jumping to manual exposure mode, start out on those semi-automatic modes which frees them to think of composition and other aspects of the photo. However, there are photogs who do believe you learn faster with manual flash. It's up to you!

If you shoot with manual flash only or TTL flash only, I suggest you give the other flash method a shot. You can only gain from it.

Monday, July 26, 2010

TTL Flash Troubleshooting Checklist (Basic to Intermediate)

Updated: August 18, 2010

Sometimes I take a shot with flash on TTL and the exposure is completely wrong (much too bright or dark), the flash doesn't fire, etc. Here are the settings I double-check to see what may have gone wrong.
  • Flash sync mode. Slow rear sync is automatically selected in program or aperture priority when the sync mode is on rear sync.
  • ISO. If the flash exposure is too high, I check if my ISO is too high. If I'm bouncing the flash and the flash exposure is too low, I check if my ISO is too low.
  • Exposure compensation. With Nikon, exposure compensation does affect flash exposure. If I used exposure compensation with a previous shot, I check if I left it on (With Canon, exposure compensation does not affect flash exposure.)
  • Flash exposure compensation on camera, on flash, on menu. There are three ways to adjust flash exposure compensation in my camera/flash combination (D300 and SB800). First, if the flash is attached to the camera, I can adjust FEC on the flash body (by pressing + or - ). Second, on the camera body, if I hold down the flash button, I can change the FEC using the sub-command dial. Third, I can change the FEC using the flash menu. The three ways to adjust the FEC are *cumulative*.
  • AE-L (auto-exposure lock). If I used AE-L in a previous shot, I check if AE-L has been released.
  • FV lock needed? If the subject is off-center, or there's an object in the foreground, aiming at the subject first then using FV lock before recomposing the picture ensures a more accurate TTL flash exposure.
  • FV Lock - is it active? If I used FV lock in a previous shot, I check if the FV lock has been released.
  • TTL-BL? TTL-BL is a mode where the camera tries to balance the flash exposure with the ambient exposure. The exposure with TTL-BL is often different from that of regular TTL. TTL-BL is the default mode but can be deactivated by pressing the mode button on the on-camera flash, or by switching the metering mode (see below).
  • Metering mode (spot, center, or matrix). Nikon's TTL flash exposure is affected by the metering mode. If the metering mode is spot, TTL-BL is deactivated. If the metering mode is center, TTL can give potentially incorrect flash exposure.
  • Batteries too low? The SB800 unfortunately has no battery meter or even a low-battery indicator. It will do its best to keep firing but when the battery is very low flash exposure sometimes becomes strange before the flash finally quits. If you fire a shot and it takes longer than usual for the flash to recharge for the next shot, that means the batteries are too low.

Additional checklist for wireless mode (CLS AWL):
  • Commander mode activated.
  • Commander mode settings saved. After inputting new settings, press OK, not just menu to go back, otherwise the new settings won't be saved.
  • CLS slave in remote mode (vs. SU-4 mode).
  • CLS slave in the correct group (Group A, Group B or Group C).
  • CLS slave on the same channel as the commander.
  • CLS slave on correct mode (TTL vs. AA vs. Manual). Note: the SB-600 has no AA mode.
  • If flash exposure is still wrong, I try switching to manual control. Once in a very rare while, the flash will still give me the wrong flash exposure notwithstanding the foregoing checklist. On those occasions, I try switching to manual mode.

Thursday, July 15, 2010

TTL Flash Tutorial in 10 Lessons (Part 2)

This is Part 2 of the TTL Flash Tutorial, and focuses on application of basic flash controls (which were covered in Part 1).

Lesson 6: Hard Light vs. Soft Light; Bouncing the Flash



a family portrait lit by bounced light

For this lesson, you'll need an external flash that can be angled upward and swiveled.  Alternatively, if your flash can't swivel or bounce, you can jump to Lesson 7 first to use the flash off-camera then come back to this lesson.
Light has several characteristics (such as intensity, color, direction, etc.).  One of the most important characteristics of light is its quality -- hard, soft, or somewhere in between.
Hard light has well-defined shadows.  Soft light has blurred shadows or sometimes even imperceptible shadows.
Example of hard light:

Example of soft light:


Soft light results from a light source that appears to be the same size as the subject or larger.  Hard light results from a light source that appears smaller than the subject.  In terms of size, what matters is not the actual size of the light source but its size as it appears to the subject, taking into account the distance between the light source and the subject.  The textbook example is the sun, which is large but because it's 150 million kilometers away from us, it appears small and thus acts as hard light.
When taking photos of people, soft light is usually more flattering (making wrinkles less apparent), while hard light is considered more dramatic.
A hotshoe flash, by itself, produces hard light when used on anything other than small objects.  However, even a small hotshoe flash can be used to produce soft light if the light is made larger.  Indoors, the most effective way to make the light larger is by bouncing the flash.  Bouncing the flash means aiming the flash to a large surface instead of directly at the subject so that the flash-illuminated surface is acts as the light source for the subject.
Two significant limits to bouncing: power and color.  Bouncing requires a lot of power because the light has to travel to the bounce surface and then to the subject.  In addition, most bounce surfaces are not perfect reflectors.  Because of the power required for bouncing, you almost always have to use a high ISO (800 or more) and a wide aperture.  (BTW, this is also what makes having a powerful flash useful.)
A second limit to bouncing is color.  The bounced light will pick up the color of the bouncing surface.  Sometimes, this isn't so bad.  For example, a light beige surface can produce a warm-looking light on the subject.  Other times, this is a serious issue, as with green walls.  To mitigate the color problem, shoot in raw so that you can adjust color temperature afterward (you can adjust color temperature with jpegs as well, but anything more than a slight change will result in serious deterioration in the image quality).

Exercise 1: bouncing from the ceiling.
1. Find a room with a white ceiling no more than 20 feet high.  Attach an external flash to your camera.
2. Take a baseline shot with the flash aimed at the subject. For ease of comparison, use a high ISO (800 or 1600) and the widest aperture available.

ISO: 800
Exposure: 1/250 sec
Aperture: 2.8
3. Take a comparison shot that uses ceiling-bounced light.  Rotate the flash head upward about 45 degrees to a part of the ceiling that is in front of the subject.  Use the same high ISO and wide aperture, then take the shot.

ISO: 800
Exposure: 1/250 sec
Aperture: 2.8
 
Exercise 2: bouncing from the wall
Light can be bounced not only from the ceiling but also from walls to create a more interesting lighting angle on the subject.
4. Find a room with a white or light-colored wall.
5. Take a shot that uses wall-bounced light.  Swivel the flash head to a part of the wall that is in front of the subject.  Use the same high ISO and wide aperture, then take the shot.
Compare the result to the baseline shot (straight flash) and the ceiling-bounced flash.

ISO: 800
Exposure: 1/250 sec
Aperture: 2.8

Exercise 3: color cast.
This exercise demonstrates the effect of a colored bouncing surface.
1. Find a wall or surface that is not neutral in color.
2. Use a white object as your subject.
3. Swivel the flash head to a part of the wall that is in front of the subject.  Use the same high ISO and wide aperture, then take the shot.  Note the color cast as evidenced by the object that no longer appears white.

Blue color cast from blue bounce surface:


Red color cast from red bounce surface:


4. If you have an image editor, you can use the color temperature adjustment function and click on the white object to neutralize the color cast.  This will, however, also alter the color of the ambient light.
Red color cast removed:


TAKEAWAY: Bouncing softens the light by illuminating a large surface, which then acts as the light source.  However it requires a lot of flash power and can create unusual color casts if the bounce surface is not neutral in color.
There are other ways of softening light, such as using a light modifier (umbrellas, softboxes, reflectors, etc.).  However, unless the light modifier is large enough, the light will not be significantly softer.  Using a large modifier will almost always require using the flash off-camera, which is covered in the next lesson.

Lesson 7: Using the Flash Off-Camera

 
a portrait lit by off-camera flash with a shoot-through umbrella

Aside from the intensity and quality of light, another very important characteristic of light is its direction.  Properly used, the direction of light reveals texture and three-dimensional form.
When a flash is attached to the camera's hotshoe (i.e. "on-camera"), the light from the flash is usually limited to coming from one direction -- the same direction as the camera (i.e., "on-axis"). On-axis light is ineffective for revealing texture and form, and usually looks unnatural.
In order to use direction of light to reveal form, the light needs to come from an angle other than on-axis.  We touched on this a bit in Lesson 6 when we bounced the flash from the wall.  For maximum control over flash direction, we need to take the flash off-camera.
Example of subject lit with on-axis light:

ISO: 800
Exposure: 1/250 sec
Aperture: 2.8

Example of subject lit with off-camera light:

ISO: 800
Exposure: 1/250 sec
Aperture: 2.8
 
Using the flash off-camera has another significant advantage: it allows the use of larger flash modifiers, such as umbrellas and softboxes.  Umbrellas require an umbrella bracket.
Example of subject lit with umbrella:

ISO: 800
Exposure: 1/250 sec
Aperture: 2.8

There are several ways to trigger the flash off-camera in TTL mode:
1. A TTL cord.  Look for a TTL cord that is made specifically for your camera brand.  One end attaches to your camera's hotshoe, and the other attaches to your flash.
2. All major manufacturers produce an external flash that can act as a commander for a second external flash (the "slave" flash).  Canon and Nikon also produce dedicated flash commanders (ST-E2 and SU-800, respectively).  All of these systems all use pulses of light to communicate with compatible slave flashes.  Note however, each system differs in ability to adjust the slave and number of groups that can be controlled.  At the time of this writing, Nikon and newer Olympus flashes allow remote FEC adjustment of up to 3 groups of slave flashes (as well as the ability to control them in manual mode).  Canon and Sony flashes use ratios instead of FEC adjustment.  Pentax does not yet allow remote adjustment.
3. Some camera bodies have a popup flash that can act as a wireless commander for a compatible external flash, allowing you to use a flash off-camera with just one external flash.  This includes all middle- and high-end Nikon bodies with popup flashes (D70 and above), the Canon 7D, newer Olympus bodies (e-#20 and newer), certain Sony bodies, and certain Pentax bodies.
4. Radio TTL is available from a few third parties for certain camera brands. Pocket Wizard ControlTL is available for Canon (Nikon version TBA). Radiopopper PX is available for Canon and Nikon.  Quantum Freexwire is available for Canon, Nikon and Olympus.
When the flash is off-camera, it can be positioned in any number of ways such as:
1. handheld;
2. on a flash bracket;
3. on a monopod or tripod;
4. on a flash stand;
5. on a light stand.


Exercise 1: On-Camera vs. Off-Camera
1. Find a subject with pronounced texture and form.
2. Take a baseline shot of the subject with the flash on-camera.


3. Take the flash off-camera, position it at least 45 degrees to the subject, on camera left or camera right.  Take a shot and compare it to the baseline.  Note the texture and form in each image. 


TAKEAWAY: The direction of light can be used to reveal form and texture.  On-axis light is the least effective direction for revealing form and texture

Lesson 8: Subject vs. Background; Key vs. Fill; Contrast




a photo with the background, highlight, and shadow independently controlled

In this lesson we learn to be more precise about flash exposure.
SUBJECT VS. BACKGROUND
When taking photos of people, you usually have both a subject and a background as important elements.  In almost all cases, the background is lit by ambient, while the subject is lit by flash, or a combination of ambient and flash.
When ambient light is one of your light sources, it's generally a good idea to adjust for the ambient exposure first, then adjust the flash exposure as necessary.

Exercise 1: Background Brighter than Subject.
When the background is brighter than the subject, adding flash to illuminate the subject is relatively simple.  In bright conditions, the challenge is for your flash to output sufficient light to match the ambient light.  To reduce the ambient light level that your flash has to match, shoot at your camera's sync speed (the high shutter speed reduces the ambient exposure without reducing the flash exposure).
1. Find a location where the background is brighter than the subject (for example, the subject can be in shade).
2. For comparison, expose for the subject.  Note the blown-out background.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/125 sec
Aperture: 6.3
3. For comparison, expose for the background.  Note the underexposed subject.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/500 sec
Aperture: 6.3
4. This time we'll add flash. First, adjust for ambient light on the background. Usually, to keep the emphasis on the subject, the background should be underexposed relative to the subject (although this is not strictly necessary).  To minimize the amount of flash power needed, set the shutter to sync speed.  Adjust the ambient so that it's underexposed 0.3 to 1 stop.  Take a test shot without flash and check the exposure of the background.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/1000 sec
Aperture: 6.3
(background 1 stop underexposed)
5. Add flash to illuminate the subject.  If possible, use the flash off-camera.  Start with an FEC of 0 (if you used exposure compensation to set the ambient, remember to zero out the FEC).  Take a shot.  If any of the highlights lack detail (i.e., are blown out), adjust the flash by decreasing FEC.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/1000 sec
Aperture: 6.3

Exercise 2: Background and Subject of Equal Brightness.
1. Find a location where the background and subject are of even brightness (ambient light falls evenly on both the background and the subject).
For comparison, all ambient:

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/10 sec
Aperture: 2.8


2. Adjust for ambient light on the background. Unlike the previous situation, underexposing the ambient is practically a necessity to avoid overexposing the subject with flash.  Adjust the ambient so that it's underexposed 1 stop.  Take a test shot without flash and check the exposure of the background.
Ambient underexposed 1 stop:

 ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/20 sec
Aperture: 2.8
3. Add flash to illuminate the subject.  If possible, use the flash off-camera.  Start with an FEC of 0 (if you used exposure compensation to set the ambient, remember to zero out the FEC).  Take a shot.  If any of the highlights lack detail (i.e., are blown out), adjust the flash by decreasing FEC.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/20 sec
Aperture: 2.8
 
SUBJECT: KEY VS. FILL
Let's leave the background aside for a moment and focus on the subject.  The subject has a highlight and a shadow.  The light that is the primary source of illumination for the subject is the key light.  The light illuminating the shadow is called fill light.  Typically, the function of fill light is to add enough light to the shadow so that shadow detail is visible.  There are other functions for light (e.g. rim light, hair light) but key and fill are the most basic ones for portraiture.
When using flash in dim conditions, the key is almost always from the flash, while the fill is from ambient or a second flash.  In bright conditions, the key can either be from ambient (in which case flash provides the fill), or it can be from the flash (in which case ambient or a second flash provides the fill). 

Exercise 3: Using Flash as Key, Ambient as Fill
1. Find a location that is not brightly lit.

2. Adjust for ambient light on the subject. Because the ambient is acting as fill it should be intentionally underexposed.  Try 1.3 to 1.7 stops underexposure.  Take a test shot without flash.  The subject should appear to be in shadow but detail should be visible.  If detail is not visible, increase ambient exposure but keep the ambient underexposed.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/30 sec
Aperture: 2.8

3. Add flash as key.  If possible, use the flash off-camera.  Start with an FEC of 0 (if you used exposure compensation to set the ambient, remember to zero out the FEC).  Take a shot.  If any of the highlights lack detail (i.e., are blown out), adjust the flash by decreasing FEC.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/30 sec
Aperture: 2.8
 
Exercise 4: Using Ambient as Key, Flash as Fill
1. Find a location that is not brightly lit.
baseline (all ambient):

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/10 sec
Aperture: 2.8
 
2. Adjust for ambient light on the subject. Because the ambient is acting as key it should be almost correctly exposed.  Ambient should still be underexposed slightly so that when you add flash, the overall exposure will not be overexposed.  Try 0.3 to 0.7 stops underexposure.  Take a test shot without flash.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/13 sec
Aperture: 2.8
(0.3 stops underexposure)
 
3. Add flash as fill.  When using the flash as fill, it need not be off-camera.  Because the flash is the fill in this shot, the flash exposure should be underexposed.  Start with an FEC of -1.3 to -1.7 (if you used exposure compensation to set the ambient, remember to zero out the FEC).  Take a shot.  If any of the shadows lack detail, adjust the flash by increasing FEC.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/13 sec
Aperture: 2.8
(pop-up flash used as fill at -1.7 FEC)

Compare: pop-up flash as key at 0 FEC:

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/13 sec
Aperture: 2.8
 
Note: some flash systems automatically "know" whether the flash is acting as fill or as key, based on the ambient exposure.  In these flash systems, there is sometimes little or no need to adjust FEC whether the flash is acting as key or as fill.

KEY VS. FILL VS. BACKGROUND
We can combine what we learned about balancing the subject and background exposure, as well as key vs. fill to balance all three: the key, fill, and background.  It sounds tougher than it is.  We do need another flash to do this, which can be the commander flash.  In this 3-light setup (2 lights + ambient), the ambient generally illuminates the background, the main flash provides the key, and the commander flash commands the key as well as contributes fill.
The general procedure starts out the same as balancing the subject vs. the background.  We just add one step (fill) to the process.

Exercise 5: Background Brighter than Subject (with Fill).
1. Find a location where the background is brighter than the subject (for example, the subject can be in shade).
2. Adjust for ambient light on the background. Usually, to keep the emphasis on the subject, the background should be underexposed relative to the subject.  Adjust the ambient so that it's underexposed 0.3 to 1 stop.  Take a test shot without flash and check the exposure of the background.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/250 sec
Aperture: 10.0
3. Add off-camera flash to illuminate the subject.  Start with an FEC of 0 (if you used exposure compensation to set the ambient, remember to zero out the FEC).  Take a shot.  If any of the highlights lack detail (i.e., are blown out), adjust the flash by decreasing FEC.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/250 sec
Aperture: 10.0
 
4. Add fill light with the master flash.  Because the master flash is providing fill light, it should be underexposed.  Try an FEC of -2.  Take a shot.  If any of the highlights lack detail (i.e., are blown out), adjust the flash by decreasing the master flash's FEC.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/250 sec
Aperture: 10.0
(pop-up flash as fill @ -2 FEC.  Note the clearer shadow detail)

Exercise 6: Background and Subject of Equal Brightness (with Fill).
1. Find a location where the background and subject are of even brightness (ambient light falls evenly on both the background and the subject).
2. Adjust for ambient light on the background. Unlike the previous situation, underexposing the ambient is a necessity to avoid overexposing the subject with flash.  Adjust the ambient so that it's underexposed 1 stop or more.  Take a test shot without flash and check the exposure of the background.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/15 sec
Aperture: 2.8
 (ambient underexposed 1 stop)
3. Add off-camera flash to illuminate the subject.  Start with an FEC of 0 (if you used exposure compensation to set the ambient, remember to zero out the FEC).  Take a shot.  If any of the highlights lack detail (i.e., are blown out), adjust the flash by decreasing FEC.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/15 sec
Aperture: 2.8
(key light added @ 0 FEC)
4. Add fill light with the master flash.  Because the master flash is providing fill light, it should be underexposed.  Try an FEC of -2.  Take a shot.  If any of the highlights lack detail (i.e., are blown out), adjust the flash by decreasing the master flash's FEC.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/15 sec
Aperture: 2.8
(fill light added @ -1.7 FEC)

CONTRAST
When using flash, one of the creative decisions you can make is to control the contrast between the highlight and the shadow. 
Sample of high contrast shot:




Sample of low contrast shot:


Note that in low contrast images, the light can seem softer even though the actual quality of light (as evidenced by the sharpness of the shadows) has not changed.
In terms of lighting controls, the traditional way to control the contrast between highlight and shadow is to control the ratio of the key to the fill, starting with the fill then adding the key.  The ratio is based on the intensity of the key as a multiplier of the fill, plus one (because the fill's light contribution also affects the key).  If the key has the same intensity as the fill, the ratio would be 2:1 (the key is 1 +1 =2).  If the key is 1 stop more than the fill (i.e. double), the ratio would be 3:1 (the key is 2 +1 =3).  If the key is 1.5 stops more than the fill (i.e., triple), the ratio would be 4:1 (the key is 3 +1 =4).
For non-setup shots, it may be difficult to build contrast systematically.  Fortunately, TTL allows quick control of contrast by adjusting fill.

Exercise 7: High contrast image
For this exercise, we'll create a high contrast image with virtually no fill light.
1. Select your camera's sync speed and choose an ISO and aperture that will underexpose the ambient by at least 2 stops.
2. Add flash as key, such that the highlight is correctly exposed (probably 0 FEC). If possible, use the flash off-camera.  Note the strong contrast between the highlight and shadow.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/250 sec
Aperture: 2.8

Exercise 8: Low contrast image
For this exercise, we'll decrease the contrast in the previous high contrast image.
3. Readjust so that the ambient is underexposed by only 0.7 stops.
4. using the same flash angle as the previous exercise, add flash as key, such that the highlight is correctly exposed (probably 0 FEC). Note the lower contrast between the highlight and shadow.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/10 sec
Aperture: 2.8

TAKEAWAY: to decrease the contrast between highlight and shadow, increase the exposure of the fill light (i.e., increase ambient exposure if fill light is being supplied by ambient; increase FEC if fill light is from a second flash).

Lesson 9: Color; color temperature and gels

a photo lit by off-camera flash with 1/4 CTO gel

The color of light can affect not only the appearance and tone of the subject but also the emotion of the image.  To do this lesson, you'll need gels for your flash.  You can buy a set of gels from your camera store, or order one online.  The Rosco Strobist gel set or swatch book is a good selection.

Exercise 1: tweaking the subject lighting.
Most people look better with slightly warmer light.
1. Take a baseline shot with flash.

2. Change the white balance to cloudy. Take another shot. Compare the skin tone with the baseline.


Exercise 2: color correction
When the ambient light is not neutral, it can differ significantly from the flash, making the flash use apparent.  To remedy this, put a gel on the flash to match the ambient.
1. Find a location lit by warm incandescent lighting.  For comparison:

 ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/15 sec
Aperture: 2.8

2. Take a baseline shot with flash where the ambient is only slightly underexposed (try 0.3 to 0.7 stops). Note the difference in color between the flash and the ambient.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/15 sec
Aperture: 2.8
 
3. Attach a CTO gel on your flash.
4. Without altering the white balance, take a test shot. Note that flash and ambient now look similar, but the subject looks too warm.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/15 sec
Aperture: 2.8
 
5. Keeping the gel on the flash, change white balance to incandescent.  Take a shot.  Note that flash and ambient now look similar, and the subject does not look too warm.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/15 sec
Aperture: 2.8
 
Exercise 3: changing the background ambient color
You can use gels to change the color of background ambient.  The background will be shifted to a color that is the opposite color of the gel on the flash.  By opposite color, I mean the complementary color on the color wheel:
Red - Green
Orange - Blue
Yellow - Violet
1. Find a location that is NOT lit by incandescent light. Daylight is ok.
2. Take a baseline shot of a subject using flash where the ambient is only slightly underexposed (try 0.3 to 0.7 stops). Note the color of the ambient light and the subject.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/10 sec
Aperture: 2.8
 
3. Attach a CTO gel on your flash.
4. Keeping the gel on the flash, change white balance to incandescent.  Take a shot.  Note the blue shift in color of the ambient, while the subject looks neutral.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/10 sec
Aperture: 2.8

Lesson 10: Lighting depth of field


a photo with controlled lighting depth of field

In photography, we're accustomed to using depth of field to mean the range that's in focus.  In lighting, depth of field means the range that has sufficient light.  Lighting depth of field is an important concept to control lighting of backgrounds, and lighting of multiple subjects.
To understand lighting depth of field, we need to know about the inverse square law, which boils down to 2 aspects of light:
1. Light diminishes quickly.  When you move away from light, you expect it to get weaker.  What you may not expect is how quickly it diminishes.  Let's say at 1 foot away from a light source, the amount of light is "X". If you were 2 feet away (i.e., twice as far) the amount of light is not 1/2 of X, but instead 1/4 of X.  If you move 3 feet away (i.e., three times as far), the the amount of light is not 1/3 but instead 1/9 of X.  If you move 4 feet away (i.e., four times as far), the the amount of light is not 1/4 but instead 1/16 of X.  Etc. etc.  To put it in non-mathematical terms, light gets weaker very quickly when you move away from it.
2. Exception: at far distances, light doesn't diminish as quickly.  The second aspect of the inverse square law is that when you're far away from the light source, moving further away doesn't make as much of a difference.  In the previous example, moving 1 foot was a big difference between 2 feet (1/4) and 3 feet (1/9).  The light at 3 feet is only about 40% of the light at 2 feet.  However, moving 1 foot from 20 feet to 21 feet isn't nearly as big of a difference: if you were at 20 feet, the light would be 1/400, while at 21 feet, the light would be 1/441 (which is 90% of the light at 20 feet).
Those two concepts comprise the inverse square law in non-technical terms.  It can be further translated in lighting depth of field ("DOF") terms: a close light source has a shallow DOF.  A far light source has a large DOF.

Exercise 1: Black Background
Want one of those portraits with black backgrounds?  This exercise, which uses shallow lighting DOF, is for you!
1. Find a room with at least 10 feet of space or more (the longer the better), and which is dimly lit.  A room with a darker wall is better and will require less space.
2. Take a baseline shot for comparison.  Position the subject next to the wall.  Position the flash as close to the subject as possible.  Adjust flash exposure as necessary so that the subject is not overexposed.  You can use an umbrella (aimed at the front of the subject) but don't bounce the flash (otherwise you may need a very large room to do this exercise).  Take a shot.  Note the amount of light on the background.
ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/250 sec
Aperture: 2.8
(small reflective umbrella used)
  3. Position the subject far from the wall.  The wall has to be at least 3x as far from the flash as the subject (preferably 4x or more).  If the flash is 2 feet away from the subject, the wall has to be at least 6 feet, and preferably 8 feet away or more from the flash.  Position the flash as close to the subject as possible.  Take a shot.  Note the amount of light on the background.
ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/250 sec
Aperture: 2.8
(small reflective umbrella used)
 4. For comparison purposes, do the same shot as in #3, but this time bounce the flash.  Note the amount of light on the background.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/250 sec
Aperture: 2.8

TAKEAWAY: A light source that is close to the subject has a shallow lighting DOF.  Shallow lighting DOF can be used to create a difference in exposure between the subject and the background.

Exercise 2: Group Picture
This exercise uses large lighting DOF.
1. Find a room with at least 10 feet of space or more (the longer the better), and which is dimly lit.
2. Pick two or more objects (the more similar they are, the better).  We'll pretend these are your subjects for a group picture.  Place the objects about 3 feet apart to simulate the people who are at the edges of a small family picture.
3. Put the flash on either side of the camera, then take a shot.  Note the difference in exposure between the subjects.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/250 sec
Aperture: 2.8
 
4. Move the flash far from the subjects, then take a shot.  Note the difference in exposure between the subjects.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/250 sec
Aperture: 2.8
(Note: exposure was increased in post-processing)
 
5. For comparison purposes, do the same shot as in #4, but this time bounce the flash.  Aim the flash to an area that is equidistant to the subjects.

ISO: 200
Exposure: 1/250 sec
Aperture: 2.8
(Note: exposure was increased in post-processing)

 
TAKEAWAY: A distant light source has a large lighting DOF.  Large lighting DOF can be used to create even exposure between multiple subjects, or between the subject and the background.

Lesson 11: Bonus Lesson
You made it through lesson 10.  There's good news and there's bad news.  The good news is you've learned enough to have a good foundation of flash knowledge.  The bad news is there's a pop quiz.  Answers below.
Exercise 1: Dragging the shutter
The term "dragging the shutter" or "flash and burn" means using a slow enough shutter speed to allow the ambient light to register ("burn in"), as in this image, where the ambient light shows up in the background.

With TTL, is it necessary to use a slow shutter speed to allow enough ambient light in the image?  If not, what other controls can be used to allow enough ambient light in the image?

Exercise 2: Troubleshooting
You're taking a photo of your friend at night with an external flash (off-camera in fact :) ) in TTL flash mode.  The ambient looks ok but the flash on your subject is overexposed.  You decrease FEC as much as you can but the flash still looks overexposed.  Which of the following is the most likely cause?
a. the narrowest aperture on your lens is too wide
b. your shutter speed is too slow
c. your ISO is too high
d. your flash unit is too powerful.
e. TTL doesn't work in certain circumstances. Switch to manual flash.
f. This is too complicated.  Let's just use ambient.

Exercise 3:
Suppose you have a subject and background that are evenly lit. You want the background to be underexposed 1 stop, and the subject to have a 2:1 key:fill ratio. What's the minimum number of flash units you would need and what settings would you choose?

Exercise 4:
Suppose you have a background lit by ambient, while the subject is shaded (assume 2 stops underexposure relative to the background). You want the background to be underexposed 1 stop, and the subject to have a 2:1 key:fill ratio. What's the minimum number of flash units you would need and what settings would you choose?

ANSWERS
Exercise 1: Dragging the shutter
Using a slow shutter speed to allow enough ambient light in the image works but it's not the only way to allow enough ambient light.  You can also use a wider aperture or higher ISO.  With TTL, choosing a wider aperture or higher ISO will not change the flash exposure (unless you go outside the minimum or maximum range of the flash).

Exercise 2: Troubleshooting
Let's analyze the possible answers one by one.
a. the narrowest aperture on your lens is too wide - although a wider aperture does allow more flash, this is not the answer for at least a couple of reasons.  First, the camera usually doesn't adjust aperture to take into account the flash exposure.  Rather, it's the other way around: the camera adjusts the flash output BASED ON aperture, ISO, and the preflash reflection to give the correct flash exposure.  Second, I'm not aware of any lens with a minimum aperture that is too wide for a proper flash exposure.
b. your shutter speed is too slow - this is not the answer because shutter speed doesn't affect flash exposure.
c. your ISO is too high - this is a possible answer.
d. your flash unit is too powerful - technically this is a possible answer but it implies that nothing can be done to achieve a correct flash exposure, so this is an unlikely answer.
e. TTL doesn't work in certain circumstances. Switch to manual flash. - there are some situations that can fool TTL flash, but in any situation where manual flash can work, TTL flash exposure can be adjusted via FEC to achieve a correct flash exposure.  In fact, sometimes, TTL has a wider working range -- the SB-800's manual mode only goes to 1/128 power whereas in TTL mode, it can output less power than 1/128 if the situation requires (within limits of course).  So this isn't the answer either.
f. This is too complicated.  Let's just use ambient. - you know I was just kidding, right?
The answer therefore is "c."  Try decreasing the ISO while using a longer shutter speed (to maintain the ambient exposure).

Exercise 3:
This sounds more complicated than it is.  The way I would do it is to set the ambient first.  I'd adjust aperture, ISO, and shutter to get -1 stop underexposure.  This would get that part of the requirement done.  This would also result in the subject being underexposed 1 stop.  The next thing I would do is add key light @ 0 FEC (zeroing out exposure comp if necessary).  Now the highlight of the subject is correctly exposed.  The shadow of the subject remains 1 stop underexposed.  Well, that also implies that it's 1/2 of the highlight of the subject, so we have a 2:1 ratio right there.  The answer is therefore: only 1 flash is needed.  Settings: underexpose ambient 1 stop, add flash as key @ 0 FEC.

Exercise 4:
This is admittedly a bit more complicated than Exercise 3.  Again I would set ambient first.  I'd adjust aperture, ISO, and shutter to get -1 stop underexposure.  This would get that part of the requirement done.  This would also result in the subject being underexposed 3 stops.  The next thing I would do is add key light @ 0 FEC (zeroing out exposure comp if necessary).  Now the highlight of the subject is correctly exposed.  The shadow of the subject remains 3 stops underexposed.  To achieve a 2:1 key:fill ratio, I would need to make the shadow 1 stop underexposed.  I can't use ambient to add to the fill or else the background would be affected.  I will therefore need a fill light.  The setting for the fill light is -1 FEC (i.e., 1 stop less than the highlight, which means 1/2 of the light of the highlight).  The answer is therefore: 2 flashes are needed.  Settings: underexpose ambient 1 stop, add flash as key @ 0 FEC, add a second flash as fill @ -1 FEC.

Congratulations! You're now done with the TTL Flash Tutorial.  E-mail me for a diploma! just kidding. You may want to go back to the sample shots to figure out how they were executed.  Feedback on this tutorial are welcome.