Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Minimizing Nikon D5200 and D7100 banding; Mysteries Remain

Many people have noted that the Nikon D5200 and Nikon D7100 have banding in the shadows when the exposure is pushed.  In this post I'll show the settings to minimize the banding.  At the same time, there are unanswered questions.

UPDATE: added real world samples of banding.
UPDATE: added a link to the new post re solutions for banding Nikon D5200 and D7100 Band-Aid: Solutions for Banding

SETTINGS

Here is the scene I used for these test shots.

I took the shots in raw, imported them into Lightroom (using the native D7100 raw support) then I pushed the exposure by 5 stops to reveal banding in the shadow areas.

I then compared the banding in the top right corner of the shelf.  I found that the settings could influence the visibility of banding.

Here is a 100% crop of the corner with 14-bit raw with lossless compression:

Here is the same corner with 14-bit raw with lossy compression:
I would say there is not much of a difference.

Now here is that corner with 12-bit raw, lossless compression:
Huge difference.

Here is that corner with 12-bit raw, lossy compression:


UPDATE! REAL WORLD SAMPLE
Some people think that the banding is only a theoretical problem and only shows up when images are pushed to unrealistic levels.  But check out this shot:
D7100-1746-201303311302-Edit.jpg

The shot links to a full-res version of the photo.  If you view the full-res you will see that there is banding in many shadow areas.  I pushed that shot only +1.7EV, Shadows +20.  The original shot was exposed for the highlights.  (For more info, see Sample of D7100 banding in a real world shot ).

I can't go back and retake the shot but I believe if I used 14-bit raw I would not have seen the banding in this case.

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS
So, is the banding simply about settings?  I don't know yet.  I downloaded the samples from DPReview and Imaging Resource and the strange thing is, none of them have any banding, even when pushed 5 stops, at any ISO.

Here is the studio scene shot for the D7100.  I cropped it to the area with the deepest shadow.  I did not see any banding at any ISO.  Here are the shots for ISO 100, 200 and 400.

ISO 100

ISO 200

ISO 400
I also downloaded the samples for the D5200.  Again I could not find the slightest hint of banding, even when pushed 5 stops.  Here are crops from the shots at ISO 100 and ISO 800.

ISO 100

ISO 800
I thought that maybe it's due to the lighting conditions of the studio scene.  So I also looked at the sample photos in the gallery for the D5200 and D7100.  I downloaded the ones with deepest shadows. (note: only JPEG samples were available).  In post, I pushed the exposure 5 stops.  Again, I could not find any banding whatsoever for either the D5200 or the D7100.

DPReview Nikon D5200 Samples:

From the file "01_20120222_0015" (ISO 100):
crop from original

+5 EV

From the file "01_20120223_0075" (ISO 100):
crop from original

+5 EV

DPReview Nikon D7100 Samples:

From the file "19DSC_0489" (ISO 1000):

+5 EV

From the file "30DSC_0512" (ISO 800):


Imaging Resource D5200 samples:

I looked at samples from Imaging Resource as well.



I even tried this deliberately underexposed shot "D5200OUTBAP0.NEF" (ISO 100):

+5 EV
I strained to find banding but could not find any.

I cannot explain why the DPReview and Imaging Resource sample shots have no banding at all, either with the D5200 or D7100.  Are DPReview and Imaging Resource using certain settings that somehow avoid banding altogether?  Or are some units defective?  The banding issue has been mentioned by Pocket Lint (D5200 and D7100) and there is chatter about it in the forums, but I haven't seen it mentioned by other professional reviewers.  I find it very strange that both units of Pocket Lint would have banding, while both units of DPR and IR have no banding.  I'm totally perplexed about this banding issue.

RELATED POSTS
Nikon D5200 and D7100 Band-Aid: Solutions for Banding
Sample of D7100 banding in a real world shot
Nikon D7100 Hands-On Real World User Review
Nikon D7100 Shadow Recovery
Importing D7100 Raw Files Into Lightroom
Nikon D7100 Real World Dynamic Range
Nikon D7100 Low Light Teaser
Nikon D7100 FAQ and Helpful Links

16 comments:

  1. there is banding in the green leafs in the last IR sample. they are very visible.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks! Now that you point it out, I do see a little bit of faint banding in the shadow portion of the green leaves. On my monitor they are much harder to see than the banding on the shelves on my test shot. I wonder why banding is much more visible on my test shots even though I can see more of the shelf than the green leaves' shadow?

      Best regards,
      Mic

      Delete
  2. I suspect that the difference is that JPEG photos simply don't have enough fine tonality recorded in the shadows to show this banding when the exposure is lifted this much. I'd try photographing your test scene in JPEG (or RAW+JPEG) and then lifting the exposure drastically.

    (RAW+JPEG would actually make an interesting comparison, since you'd get a side by side comparison for exactly the same data.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Chris I'll try that test.

      Best regards,
      Mic

      Delete
  3. So when you push it past the point of it being a picture your giving it a name.

    You have way too much time on your hands, bud.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Mic,

    I think this is because you used ACR to process the NEF files, Nikon's software produces the best results and no banding (I use Capture NX 2).

    Thanks for all of the excellent work reviewing the Nikon gear, I might pick up a D7100.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Will. Thanks for the tip! I haven't used Capture NX2. I'll try it out and post the results.

      Best regards,
      Mic

      Delete
    2. Cool! I really love it. Let me know if you need any tips, it has powerful features but they are not always obvious. I also have custom sharpening settings I wrote that produce detail in the NEF files, especially the D7100.

      Delete
    3. Hi Will. I tried Capture NX2 and it does show banding as well. It is not as obvious because the exposure compensation is limited to +/- 2EV but if you add +100 (or even +40) shadow protection and +2EV then yes banding is easily visible in the deep shadow areas.

      Best regards,
      Mic

      Delete
    4. Hmmm, very interesting. I did the same with the shots from DPReview and a couple of others and couldn't make it happen. I haven't seen banding since my D200, this is so strange!

      Delete
    5. Hi Will. You're right the DPReview shots have no banding. The Imaging Resource D7100 shots barely have any banding either. Initially I thought it was because some units like the one I had were defective. However, I have tried another D7100 and I know others who have done so as well and we all found banding. Therefore it appears that the reason the DPR and IR images don't have banding is because their shadows are not deep enough.

      As for the D200 I never had one but I didn't observe banding either in my Fuji S5, D80, D90, D300, or D300S. Other than the D7100 the only other Nikon I had where I observed banding was the D70.

      If you're curious to see the banding in Capture NX2, pls email me at info@betterfamilyphotos.com. I can send you a raw file from the D7100.

      Best regards,
      Mic

      Delete
    6. Hi Mic,

      No need to send the file, but I will do testing if I get a D7100!

      Really enjoying your site, thanks much!

      Will

      Delete
  5. I tested jpg and raw files and they have both banding but raw processed with Photoshop camera raw have less and different pattern.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Ermis. Thanks for posting your experience comparing the jpg and raw files. You might also try RawTherapee, which I think shows even less banding http://betterfamilyphotos.blogspot.com/2013/04/nikon-d5200-and-d7100-band-aid.html

      Best regards,
      Mic

      Delete

Thanks for your comment. It will be published as soon as we get a chance to review it, sorry for that, but we get lots of spam with malicious links.