There was no seal on the box, so I thought maybe it was a returned unit. However, the shutter count showed 0 shots.
The serial number had a letter "M" in the third digit, which appears to confirm that it is from Asia or Australia (US units have "A" or "B" in the third digit). There was also no warranty card in the box. So, just as Abe's had said, it appears to be a gray market import.
The serial number began with 43, which I read means it was manufactured in 2014, 3rd quarter. The firmware version was 1.20. This firmware appears to have been installed at the factory because the package included a copy of the pamphlet explaining the features of the new firmware.
I checked for the sticky aperture blade issue, and so far I can take shots at any aperture with no problems.
I will be posting a quick review after trying it out. I will be evaluating from the perspective of taking candid photos. As best as I can, I will also compare it to the Sony RX1. I sold mine a long time ago (as part of cutting down on photography gear) but I'll post my impressions for what they're worth.
I can't wait to hear your views on the X100s! I have wanted to buy this camera for a while but have never felt able to properly justify it. It is very temptingly priced, especially compared to the RX1 and also now as a secondhand buy given the X100T.
ReplyDeleteI'm particularly keen to hear your view on the focus performance, which I guess will be in between the RX1 and a dSLR, and would love to know how it handles kid candids.
Hey there old friend! Good to hear from you. Yes I will definitely include an assessment of the X100s' AF ability for candid shots.
DeleteBest regards,
Mic
I am very interested in the comparison between the x100s and rx1. At the moment I have an X100 and I'm thinking of going to full frame. As high ISO with lesser noise is what I need more and more these days ...
ReplyDeleteHi there! I'm working on the X100S review and am hoping to get it done this week. Meanwhile here are some differences between them:
Delete- The RX1 has better colors (IMO), 1 stop shallower DOF, gorgeous bokeh (may be the best I've ever had, even counting the Sigma 50 1.4), better sharpness (especially at close range). The higher bit depth gives you beautiful black and white images as well. In terms of high ISO performance, the X100S looks like it has much more aggressive noise reduction, so the RX1 noise is comparable to the X100S, but the RX1 is much more detailed. The X100S ISO also appears to be inflated (I will pin this down in my post). I also prefer the RX1's controls (including a better aperture ring). The RX1 build quality is also in an entirely different league.
However, the X100S has slightly faster autofocus and a better implementation of manual focus (the distance doesn't reset, for one thing). The X100S is also thinner and lighter. The X100S also comes with a viewfinder, whereas the RX1 has a great EVF (and can be used as a waist level finder) but it costs extra $$$.
Perhaps at CES Sony will announce the RX2 ;)
Best regards,
Mic