tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2361251099864607419.post3104887015268287761..comments2024-03-18T01:15:17.741-07:00Comments on Better Family Photos: UPDATED: Fotodiox Offers Medium Format Digital System for Under $1000360 Rumorshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01173469932778454315noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2361251099864607419.post-32346760118270649872013-03-11T18:29:12.925-07:002013-03-11T18:29:12.925-07:00http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UBTE4xpvpk
D800 ag...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UBTE4xpvpk<br />D800 against Hasselblad digital back, at the end, the studio photographer would get Hassies because there is one key difference between the files, it's the color itself, stitching a panorama would only make your picture bigger, to capture more from a single POV, so, let it be conventional panorama techniques for landscape or using the Brenizer method for portrait, it's still looking at a frame from a single pov, as you grow from DX to FF, FF to MF, if your lens is fixed, you try to get more of the subject into the frame, that is only the format, that won't affect the way color are rendered. <br /><br />So, in a way, I don't think the richness can be match for now with stitching. :)<br />The MF has it own way to convey the different grade of the flesh tones, there is a lot more levels between the brightest and the darkest area than a FF camera, it's close, but from this single review, they consider that there is still a gap. <br /><br />For what I am doing, I'll stay with a DSLR... that's fine by me. :)Valutinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00753946945143584032noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2361251099864607419.post-20342925758002168912013-03-08T11:50:02.523-08:002013-03-08T11:50:02.523-08:00Thanks Valentin. I wonder how feasible it is to u...Thanks Valentin. I wonder how feasible it is to use with people. I also keep hearing that medium format has richness and tonality that cannot be matched even by full frame DSLRs. Does a stitched panorama offer the same richness? I wonder.360 Rumorshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01173469932778454315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2361251099864607419.post-23776256614972378302013-03-08T02:30:46.778-08:002013-03-08T02:30:46.778-08:00http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/...http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/Horseman_LD.shtml <br />:)Valutinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00753946945143584032noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2361251099864607419.post-88485727020764253892013-03-07T22:25:02.457-08:002013-03-07T22:25:02.457-08:00Hi Valentin. I'm not familiar with the horsem...Hi Valentin. I'm not familiar with the horseman LD. Thanks for the info about that. The horseman makes this one look like a bargain by comparison, even with the cost of a NEX camera. I'm curious to see real world results from both.<br /><br />Best regards,<br />Mic<br /><br />360 Rumorshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01173469932778454315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2361251099864607419.post-60762735638148267042013-03-07T18:00:13.085-08:002013-03-07T18:00:13.085-08:00Actually, you do have those kind of things for oth...Actually, you do have those kind of things for other mounts, I think of the "horseman LD". And I always wanted to make one myself... :)<br /><br />But one of the limitation of these system is the way the light reaches the sensor, on our DSLR bodies and mirror-less, the sensor is built in the bottom of a box, pretty far away from the mount, so if you tilted your lens quite badly, you might get some truncated pictures, or vignetting. At least, that's what I thought when thinking about the system.<br />So, it's not too surprising they are taking the body that has the shortest flange distance to minimize this effect. <br />Solution would be to disassemble the whole camera and have the sensor sticking in front of the body, just next to the mount. like a real medium format. :)Valutinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00753946945143584032noreply@blogger.com